Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd vs Tarun Pal Singh on 15 November, 2017
Further, in "Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Limited vs.
Tarun Pal Singh and Ors" 38 the Supreme Court went on to explain
that a proviso cannot be interpreted as stating a general rule. He has
submitted that there is nothing exceptional in the language or
scheme of Section 33(1) or the first proviso to suggest that the
proviso warrants a deviation from the general rule of interpretation.
It cannot therefore be construed as creating an independent right in
favour of the Plaintiff beyond the main enacting section.