Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (2.36 seconds)

Tarun Kumar vs Assistant Director Directorate Of ... on 11 October, 2023

33. The Hon'ble Apex Court has further observed in the aforesaid judgment, i.e., Tarun Kumar vs. Assistant Director Directorate of Enforcement (supra) that it is axiomatic that the principle of parity is based on the guarantee of positive equality before law enshrined in Article 14 of the Constitution. However, if any illegality or irregularity has been committed in favour of any individual or a group of individuals, or a wrong order has been passed by a judicial forum, others cannot invoke the jurisdiction of the higher or superior court for 10 repeating or multiplying the same irregularity or illegality or for passing similar wrong order. Article 14 is not meant to perpetuate the illegality or irregularity. If there has been a benefit or advantage conferred on one or a set of people by any authority or by the court, without legal basis or justification, other persons could not claim as a matter of right the benefit on the basis of such wrong decision.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shivam Tyagi @ Kalu vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 17 October, 2023

44. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Shivani Tyagi v. State of U.P. & Anr. 2024 INSC 343 has derived the principle that the factors like nature of the offence held to have committed, the manner of their commission, the gravity of the offence, and also the desirability of releasing the convict on bail are to be considered objectively and such consideration should reflect in the consequential order passed in relation of suspension of sentence.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1