Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.23 seconds)

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd vs The Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd on 12 October, 2007

7 The law revolving around Section 7(4)(b) of Arbitration Act is very clear whereby exchange of letters, telex, telegrams or other means of communication also amounts to an arbitration agreement in writing. The parties, as recorded through the exchange of emails, recorded the agreements thereby all the terms and conditions of the agreement dated 1 April 2007 of the basic arbitration agreement got extended. Therefore, the conclusion that through these three emails, the parties have agreed and extended the contractual obligation and in fact acted accordingly need no interference. Having once extended the agreement in toto, any dispute between the parties for the transaction based upon the same required to be adjudicated on the basis of main agreement itself. The finding, therefore, based upon the facts and the law of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd v. Great Eastern Shipping Co Ltd 1 and further in Trimex International FZE Limited, Dubai v. Vedanta 1 AIR 2008 SC 357 16/21 ::: Uploaded on - 05/03/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 06/03/2016 00:02:17 ::: dgm 17 app-407-15.sxw Aluminium Limited, India2 support the reasons which we also find is well within the frame work of law and the record.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 48 - D K Jain - Full Document
1