Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.20 seconds)
Krishan Gopal vs Gurmeet Kaur (Dead) Through Lrs on 15 July, 2025 cites

Sukhbir Singh & Ors vs Brij Pal Singh & Ors on 10 May, 1996

13. Well settled is the legal proposition that, to prove his readiness and willingness, a purchaser need not necessarily produce the money or carry it with him or vouch a concluded scheme of finance. [See Nathulal vs. 8 Phoolchand1; and Sukhbir Singh & Ors. vs. Brij Pal Singh & Ors. 2]. It is equally well settled that readiness and willingness is to be inferred from the conduct of the parties.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 94 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document

Kanshi Ram vs Om Prakash Jawal & Ors on 15 April, 1996

18. It appears that the balance sale consideration of ₹9,00,000/- was deposited before the Executing Court by the plaintiffs in February, 2012. However, we are informed that there has been an astronomical rise in the prices of lands in the vicinity of the suit land. Even if that be so, mere escalation of land prices would not be a reason, by itself, to deny the equitable relief of specific performance once sufficient grounds are made out for granting such relief [See Kanshi Ram vs. Om Prakash Jawal & Ors. 6 and Gobind Ram vs. Gian Chand7].
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 87 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document
1