Ajay Hasia Etc vs Khalid Mujib Sehravardi & Ors. Etc on 13 November, 1980
13. Thus, the proposition that emerges is that for an
establishment to be a 'State' as defined under Article 12 of the
8 of 20
::: Downloaded on - 03-03-2023 01:58:50 :::
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:033951
CWP No.27527 of 2017 9
Constitution of India, it must pass the tests as enumerated by Apex
Court in Ajay Hasia's case (supra) and reiterated by the Constitution
Bench in the case of Pradeep Kumar Biswas (supra). In case the
establishment against whom writ has been filed falls within the ambit
of Article 12 and can be termed as 'State', there would be no doubt
about the same being amenable to writ jurisdiction. However, writ
petition will not be held to be maintainable against a body discharging
public function merely because it does not fall within the definition of
'State'. The test is : whether cause of action pleaded by the petitioner
involves breach of statutory provision? In the case of Cooperative
Society also though it is not 'State' but a breach of statutory Rules
would render it amenable to writ jurisdiction.