Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.23 seconds)

R.S.Nayak vs A.R.Antulay on 5 April, 1984

In Antulay's case a complaint of documented corruption died an unnatural death because of multifarious Writs and SLPs, despite the fact that for every ton of cement, for which licence was granted, a fixed amount of donation was paid by the licencees in the Trusts created for this purpose and the entire payment was documented. Despite all that, the complaint against corruption got killed and nothing happened, courtesy Indian Judicial System. The judicial process is often used as a tool to see that even if there is documented proof of commission of Crl. Rev. P. No. 120 of 2010 Page 11 of 13 crime, the accused gets scot free because of multifarious levels of appeals, writs, revisions, 482 Cr. P.C. petitions and SLPs to which the accused and petitioners have unlimited access under the present system. The real judicial reform can come in this country only when, despite the strength of money power and political power, one is not able to capture the judicial system and hold it to ransom on the strength of this power.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 3 - D A Desai - Full Document
1