Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.29 seconds)
N.Palanisamy vs Sri Maruthi Processors on 13 December, 2017 cites

Arulvelu & Anr vs State Rep By Public Prosecutor & Anr on 7 October, 2009

17. In the teeth of this legal position, the order of acquittal of the accused passed by the first appellate Court suffers from manifest illegality warranting interference. The reasons given for acquittal does not pass muster the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Arulvelu and another v. State rep by the Public Prosecutor and another [(2009) 10 SCC 206]. However, the complainant has failed to establish that Kamalam [A3] was in-charge and responsible for the affairs of Sri Maruthi Processors [A1] for fastening vicarious liability under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Supreme Court of India Cites 37 - Cited by 440 - D Bhandari - Full Document
1