Union Of India vs Ibrahim Uddin & Anr on 17 July, 2012
16/ Learned counsel for the appellant has failed to show
that how the finding of fact recorded by the Courts below are
illegal, perverse or based upon no evidence. Thus, no substantial
question of law arises for consideration in the present second
appeal. The Supreme court in number of cases has held that in
exercise of powers under section 100 of the CPC the Court can
interfere with the finding of fact only if the same is shown to be
perverse and based upon no evidence. Some of these judgments
are Hafazat Hussan Vs. Abdul Majeed and others , 2011(7) SCC
189, Union of India Vs. Ibrahim Uddin, 2012(8) SCC 148 and
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: AMOL
NIVRUTTIRAO MAHANAG
Signing time: 11-07-2024
18:21:01
7
Vishwanath Agrawal Vs. Sarla Vishwanath Agralwal 2912(7)
SCC 288.