Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.19 seconds)
United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Shimla vs Tilak Singh And Ors on 4 April, 2006 cites

Madineni Kondaiah And Ors. Etc. vs Yaseen Fatima And Ors. on 22 June, 1985

In G. Govindan v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and Ors., [1999] 3 SCC 754, this Court had occasion to refer to the decisions of the Full Bench of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in Kondaiah's case (supra), Complete Insulations Ltd. (supra) and New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Sheela Rani (Smt.) and Ors., in the context of the 1988 Act and, after contrasting it with the provisions of 1939 Act, held (vide para 13):
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 28 - Cited by 80 - Full Document

Dr. T. V. Jose.. Appellant vs Chacko P. M. Alias Thankachan & Ors... ... on 27 September, 2001

In Dr. T.V. Jose v. Chacko P.M. alias Thankachan and Ors., [2001] 8 SCC 748 Variava, J. had an occasion to survey the law with regard to the liability of insurance companies in respect of gratuitous passengers. After referring to a number of decisions of this Court the learned Judge observed (vide para 20) "the law on this subject is clear, a third-party policy does not cover liability to gratuitous passengers who are not carried for hire or reward." The insurer company was held not liable to reimburse the appellant.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 259 - S N Variava - Full Document

New India Assurance Compafiy vs Shri Satpal Singh And Ors on 2 December, 1999

223. In that case the discussion arose in connection with carrying passengers in a goods vehicle. This Court after referring to the terms of section 147 of the 1988 Act, as contrasted with section 95 of the 1939 Act, held that the judgment in Satpal Singh's case (supra) had been incorrectly decided and that the insurer will not be liable to pay compensation.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 451 - Full Document
1