Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.27 seconds)
Ex. Constable Vinod Kumar vs The Commissioner Of Police (Delhi) on 24 December, 2010 cites

The Delhi Cloth And General Mills Ltd vs Kushal Bhan on 10 March, 1959

6. Even if respondents had any doubt, they should have held a departmental enquiry. There is no justification to dispense with the enquiry. He has placed reliance on Delhi Cloth Mill Ltd. vs. Kaushal Bhan, AIR 1960 SC 806 and has prayed that the O.A. may be allowed. At the time of arguments, applicant informed us, his judgment is likely to be pronounced in criminal case on 22.12.2010.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 241 - K N Wanchoo - Full Document

Tarsem Singh vs State Of Punjab And Others on 5 December, 2008

19. At this juncture it would be advantageous to refer to the judgment of Honble Supreme Court in Tarsem Singh Vs. State of Punjab and Others reported in 2008 (2) SCC (L&S) 140 wherein it was clearly held that subjective satisfaction of authority for dispensing with departmental enquiry must be based on objective criteria. The short facts of the case were that Tarsem Singh, a police constable, was charge-sheeted for commission of misconduct, viz., outraging modesty of a woman by entering her house along with his accomplices, having carnal intercourse against the law of nature with a migrant labourer by stuffing cloth in his month and causing threats of dire consequences to anyone deposing against him in an inquiry/ investigation. The concerned authority, on being satisfied that the constable could win over aggrieved people as well as witnesses from giving evidence by threatening or other means, dispensed with the formal departmental proceeding. Report of the preliminary enquiry conducted by the DSP was also taken into consideration to hold that regular departmental enquiry need not be held, yet the order of dismissal was set aside by the Honble Supreme Court.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 59 - J Singh - Full Document
1