Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.39 seconds)
Raffiuddin And 2 Others vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home ... on 5 January, 2023 cites

State Of Haryana And Ors vs Ch. Bhajan Lal And Ors on 21 November, 1990

In the case of Dhruvaram Murlidhar Sonar vs. State of Maharashtra; (2019) 18 SCC 191 after considering the decisions of this Court in Bhajan Lal (Supra), it is held by this Court that exercise of powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the proceedings is an exception and not a rule. It is further observed that inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. though wide is to be exercised sparingly, carefully and with caution, only when such exercise is justified by tests specifically laid down in section itself. It is further observed that appreciation of evidence is not permissible at the stage of quashing of proceedings in exercise of powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C."
Supreme Court of India Cites 44 - Cited by 19733 - S R Pandian - Full Document

Satender Kumar Antil vs Central Bureau Of Investigation on 11 July, 2022

It is trite to say that any order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court is binding on all Courts and there is no need for issuance of any separate direction to the Court below to follow the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. In case, the applicants surrender and move an application for bail, the same shall be considered by the learned Court below, expeditiously, in accordance with law.
Supreme Court of India Cites 131 - Cited by 19037 - M M Sundresh - Full Document
1