Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.22 seconds)
Cisco Systems Capital India Pvt Ltd vs Manthan Broadband Services Pvt Ltd on 10 December, 2025 cites

Lalit Kumar Sharma And Anr vs State Of U.P. & Anr on 6 May, 2008

"24. The learned trial court has rightly observed that in Lalit Kumar Sharma v. State of U.P. (2008) 5 SCC 638, the original complaint was still pending due to which it was held that since the compromise did not fructify, the cheques issued as per settlement could not be said to be issued towards payment of debt. In the present case, the respondent withdrew the complaint and it cannot be said that the compromise did not fructify.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 82 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Alka Kaushal vs Gulshan Arora on 31 January, 2023

60.This case is on all fours with Alka Kaushal (supra). The undisputed Mediation Settlement dated 24.04.2015 between the parties is found to be a binding contract. Accused Persons defaulted on payments in 2015 and their cheques bounced. NI Act complaints were filed and were settled on more cheques being given. On this assurance and settlement, previous complaints were withdrawn. The Accused Persons cannot be allowed to now escape their liability under the same and they cannot be allowed to take defenses as were available in the original complaints, which stood withdrawn on their assurance to pay.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - A J Bhambani - Full Document
1