Lav Nigam vs Chairman And Managing Director, Iti ... on 17 March, 2004
petitioners that almost 30 years have passed by and some of the
teachers are now about to complete their career, in such
circumstances, this Court should not interfere with the orders of
the learned Single Judge and they should be allowed to
continue in the service. It is their contention that the
proceedings were not in accordance with the directions
contained in the judgment dated 25.07.2012. Learned counsel
for the respondent-petitioners have relied on Rule 17 (23)(ii)
and Rule 18(2) of the CCA Rule, 2005 to contend that no
reason for disagreement with the findings arrived at by the
Vigilance Department and the Three Member Committee has
been recorded. To support the submission, reliance has been
placed on Paragraphs 10, 13 and 14 of the judgment in the case
Patna High Court L.P.A No.109 of 2018 dt.12-07-2019
43/49
of Lav Nigam vs. Chairman & MD, ITI Ltd. and Anr.