Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.25 seconds)
Ami Chand vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 14 September, 2020 cites

Sundeep Kumar Bafna vs State Of Maharashtra & Anr on 27 March, 2014

In Sundeep Kumar Bafna v. State of Maharashtra, (2014) 16 SCC 623, Supreme Court holds, ::: Downloaded on - 14/09/2020 20:19:02 :::HCHP 14 (2). In the impugned Judgment, the learned Single Judge has opined that when the Appellant's plea to surrender before the Court is accepted and he is assumed to be in its custody, the police would be deprived of getting his custody, which is not .
Supreme Court of India Cites 56 - Cited by 504 - V Sen - Full Document

Km. Hema Mishra vs State Of Up & Ors on 16 January, 2014

In Hema Mishra v. State of Uttar Pradesh, (2014) 4 SCC 453, Supreme Court of India holds, (21). I may, however, point out that there is unanimity in the view that in spite of the fact that Section 438 has been specifically omitted and made inapplicable in the State of Uttar Pradesh, still a party aggrieved can invoke the jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, being extraordinary jurisdiction and the vastness of the powers naturally impose considerable responsibility in its application.
Supreme Court of India Cites 35 - Cited by 238 - K Radhakrishnan - Full Document
1