Bharat Aluminium Co vs Kaiser Aluminium Technical ... on 6 September, 2012
12. Counsel for the respondent submits that the Agreement was entered
prior to the judgment of Bharat Aluminium Co. vs. Kaiser Aluminium
Technical Service Inc., 2012 (9) SCC 552 rendered by the Supreme Court.
The agreement was executed and duly stamped by the parties at Navi
Mumbai, Maharashtra. The Agreement does not specify the place of
performance of the contract or that part of it will be in Delhi. The respondent
has its registered office and places of business at Gurgaon, Haryana and
Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra respectively. The correspondences by the
petitioner are addressed to the respondent's office in Haryana and the
respondent has duly replied to the said correspondence from its office at
Gurgaon, Haryana. Thus, the Agreement does not confer any territorial
jurisdiction in Delhi Courts.