Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (1.67 seconds)

A Dot Limited vs Registrar Of Trade Marks on 11 April, 2023

12. It is contended that the learned Single Judge wrongly rejected the mark merely because it comprises common English words, despite precedent protecting such combinations. Reliance is placed on decisions of the learned Single Bench of this Court inA Dot Limited v. Registrar of Trade Marks8, Kohler Co. v. Registrar of Trade Marks9, Grey Matters Educations Trust v. Examiner of Trade Marks10, and in the decision of the Madras High Court in Just Lime My Child Foundation v. Registrar of Trade Marks11.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - S Narula - Full Document

Kohler Co vs Registrar Of Trade Marks on 18 January, 2023

12. It is contended that the learned Single Judge wrongly rejected the mark merely because it comprises common English words, despite precedent protecting such combinations. Reliance is placed on decisions of the learned Single Bench of this Court inA Dot Limited v. Registrar of Trade Marks8, Kohler Co. v. Registrar of Trade Marks9, Grey Matters Educations Trust v. Examiner of Trade Marks10, and in the decision of the Madras High Court in Just Lime My Child Foundation v. Registrar of Trade Marks11.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - S Narula - Full Document

Grey Matters Educational Trust vs Examiner Of Tgrade Marks on 2 December, 2022

13. The appellant submits that the impugned judgment violates the anti-dissection rule by dissecting the mark word-by-word instead of assessing it as a whole. Reliance is placed on Grey Matters Educations Trust (supra) and Ticona Polymers, Inc. v. Registrar of Trade Marks.12 7 2016 SCC OnLine Del 5669 8 C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 25/2021 9 C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 34/2022 10 2024 SCC OnLine Del 7390 11 CMA (TM) No. 5 of 2024 Signature Not Verified 12 2023 SCC OnLine Del 1234 Digitally Signed By:AJIT KUMAR LPA 571/2025 Page 5 of 14 Signing Date:15.02.2026 20:58
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - S Narula - Full Document
1