Anil Verma vs R.K. Jewellers Sk Group & Ors. on 25 April, 2019
9. Without prejudice, it is contended that the mark has acquired
distinctiveness under the proviso to Section 9(1) of the Act. The
appellant disputes the finding of descriptiveness, submitting that
"ONE FOR ALL", taken as a whole, does not describe the kind,
nature, quality, purpose or characteristics of books and requires a
mental pause to connect it with the goods. Reliance is placed on Anil
Verma v. R.K. Jewellers5and Disruptive Health Solutions Pvt. Ltd. v.
Registrar of Trade Marks.6
4
2023:DHC:3476
5
2019:DHC:2276
Signature Not Verified
6
2022:DHC:2545.