Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.57 seconds)
Vaibhav Jain vs Directorate Of Enforcement on 29 October, 2024 cites

Abhishek Boinpally vs Directorate Of Enforcement on 3 July, 2023

20. In the present case, both the applicants were arrested on 30.06.2022. They have been in custody since more than 24 months. Moreover, the trial is Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed BAIL APPLN. 3301/2024 and BAIL APPLN. 3406/2024 Page 14 of 18 By:GAUTAM ASWAL Signing Date:29.10.2024 13:42:25 yet to commence and is likely take some time to conclude. It is also pertinent to note that the main accused Satyendra Jain has already been granted bail by the Sessions Judge vide order dated 18.10.2024. Parity as a ground is applicable even in PMLA cases, as held in Abhishek Boinpally (Supra).
Delhi High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - D K Sharma - Full Document

S.C. Legal Aid Committee Representrial ... vs Union Of India on 7 October, 1994

In Supreme Court Legal Aid Committee (Representing Undertrial Prisoners) v. Union of India [Supreme Court Legal Aid Committee (Representing Undertrial Prisoners) v. Union of India, (1994) 6 SCC 731, para 15 : 1995 SCC (Cri) 39] , it was held that undertrials cannot indefinitely be detained pending trial. Ideally, no person ought to suffer adverse consequences of his acts unless the same is established before a neutral arbiter. However, owing to the practicalities of real life where to secure an effective trial and to ameliorate the risk to society in case a potential criminal is left at large pending trial, the courts are tasked with deciding whether an individual ought to be released pending trial or not. Once it is obvious that a timely trial would not be possible and the accused has suffered incarceration for a significant period of time, the courts would ordinarily be obligated to enlarge them on bail.
Supreme Court of India Cites 22 - Cited by 478 - A M Ahmadi - Full Document
1