Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.56 seconds)
Icici Lombard General Insurance Co Ltd vs Adesh Sharma & Ors on 21 March, 2016 cites

Sarla Verma & Ors vs Delhi Transport Corp.& Anr on 15 April, 2009

7. The claimants had proved before the tribunal that the deceased, after retiring from Army service, was working for gain as an Assistant Manager in a private security agency. Though they could not prove the exact emoluments, which he was earning from the said private employment, the MAC. APP. No.418/2010 Page 4 of 6 tribunal assumed it to the extent of ₹3,900/-, it being wages of a skilled worker and added 50% towards future prospects. Having regard to the view taken in Sarla Verma (Smt.) & Ors. v. Delhi Transport Corporation & Anr., (2009) 6 SCC 121 and Reshma Kumari V. Madan Mohan (2013) 9 SCC 65, this was not correct.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 20141 - R V Raveendran - Full Document

Reshma Kumari & Ors vs Madan Mohan & Anr on 2 April, 2013

7. The claimants had proved before the tribunal that the deceased, after retiring from Army service, was working for gain as an Assistant Manager in a private security agency. Though they could not prove the exact emoluments, which he was earning from the said private employment, the MAC. APP. No.418/2010 Page 4 of 6 tribunal assumed it to the extent of ₹3,900/-, it being wages of a skilled worker and added 50% towards future prospects. Having regard to the view taken in Sarla Verma (Smt.) & Ors. v. Delhi Transport Corporation & Anr., (2009) 6 SCC 121 and Reshma Kumari V. Madan Mohan (2013) 9 SCC 65, this was not correct.
Supreme Court of India Cites 26 - Cited by 2700 - R M Lodha - Full Document

Smt Shashikala vs Gangalakshmamma on 15 July, 2013

10. It is noted that the awards under the heads of loss of consortium, funeral expenses and loss to estate are unduly low. Following the view taken in Rajesh & Ors. v. Rajbir Singh & Ors., (2013) 9 SCC 54 and Shashikala V. Gangalakshmamma (2015) 9 SCC 150, the award towards loss of consortium is increased to ₹1 lakh and under the other two heads to ₹25,000/- each. Adding the cost incurred towards medicines and treatment MAC. APP. No.418/2010 Page 5 of 6 (₹20,000/-) and award under the loss of love & affection at ₹1 lakh, the total compensation payable in the case comes to (10,26,000 + 1,00,000 + 1,00,000 + 25,000 + 25,000 + 20,000) ₹12,96,000/-. In view of the finding of contributory negligence to the extent of 25%, the claimants are held entitled to receive (12,96,000 x 3 ÷ 4) ₹9,72,000/-. Needless to add, the amount of ₹50,000 already paid under the no fault liability shall have to be deducted and the net amount shall be receivable with interest as levied by the tribunal.
Karnataka High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 417 - Full Document
1