Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.19 seconds)

Ramesh Kumar vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 17 October, 2001

It is a tentative view that the Court forms on the basis of record and documents annexed Signature Not Verifiedtherewith. No doubt that the word œinstigate used in Signed by: MADHU SOODAN PRASAD Section 107 IPC has been explained by this Court in Ramesh Signing time: 12-04-2023 11:06:56 AM Kumar v. State of Chhattisgarh ((2001) 9 SCC 618) to say that 11 where the accused had, by his acts or omissions or by a continued course of conduct, created such circumstances that the deceased was left with no other option except to commit suicide, an instigation may have to be inferred. In other words, instigation has to be gathered from the circumstances of the case. All cases may not be of direct evidence in regard to instigation having a direct nexus to the suicide. There could be cases where the circumstances created by the accused are such that a person feels totally frustrated and finds it difficult to continue existence.'' Therefore, it is clear that a person can be said to have instigated another person, when he actively suggests or stimulates him by means of language, direct or indirect. Instigate means to goad or urge forward or to provoke, incite, urge or encourage to do an act.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 847 - R C Lahoti - Full Document
1