Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.95 seconds)
Prabhu Lal Gurjar vs State Of Rajasthan on 15 September, 2021 cites

Sunderbha1 Ambalal Desai vs State Of Gujarat on 1 October, 2002

25. This Court, on a careful examination of the precedent laws in an intricate manner, finds that the precedent laws of Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai & Ors. Vs. State of Gujarat (supra) and Adhikshak Rashtriya Chambal Abhyaran Vs. Narottam Singh (supra), as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, shall govern the field, and thus, the vehicles seized under the mining law and the forest law, shall be released, upon charging the compensation/compounding fee or without charging the compensation/compounding fee, only and only, if the confiscation proceedings in regard thereto have not been initiated by the State authorities. It is to be noted that both mining and the forest laws have the provisions for confiscation proceedings.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 3611 - Full Document

Smt. Basavva Kom Dyamangouda Patil vs State Of Mysore And Anr. on 19 April, 1977

In Basavva Kom Dyamangouda Patil v. State of Mysore: (1977) 4 SCC 358 this Court dealt with a case where the seized articles were not available for being returned to the complainant. In that case, the recovered ornaments were kept in a trunk in the police station and later it was found missing, the question was with regard to (Downloaded on 15/09/2021 at 08:56:10 PM) (13 of 39) [CRLMP-3595/2021] payment of those articles. In that context, the Court observed as under:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 596 - S M Ali - Full Document
1