Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.72 seconds)
V.K. Nambudiri vs Union Of India (Uoi) on 4 October, 1960 cites

M.R. Venkataraman vs Commissioner Of Police And Anr. on 27 March, 1950

AS has been pointed out by Lord Goddard, C. J., in regard to police personnel in R. v. Metropolitan Police Commissioner; Ex parte, Parker, (1953) 2 All ER 717 and in regard to the Fire Brigade in Ex parte, Fry, (1954)2 All ER 118 interference by Courts in the exercise of powers would hamper the free exercise thereof which is a matter of necessity in public interests. The public interests require that in the case of Military Servants the pleasure of the- president, who is the Supreme Command of the Defence Forces, should not be made the subject-matter of litigations.
Madras High Court Cites 55 - Cited by 33 - Full Document

Mahant Moti Das vs S. P. Sahi, The Special Officer In ... on 15 April, 1959

15. Absolute equality for everybody is an impossibility and is not what is provided for in Article 14. Equality in treatment Can only be when there is equality of circumstances and Conditions. It is now well settled that Article 14 does not forbid reasonable classification. All that are required to justify classification and consequent discrimination are (1) the classification must be founded on an intelligible differentia which distinguishes persons who are grouped together from the others who are left out of the group, and (2) that differentia must have a rational relation to the object sought to be achieved by the proceedings. (See Moti Das v. S. P. Sahi, AIR 1959 SC 942 at p. 947).
Supreme Court of India Cites 57 - Cited by 139 - S K Das - Full Document
1