Search Results Page
Search Results
31 - 40 of 47 (0.14 seconds)Article 323B in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 25 in The Patents Act, 1970 [Entire Act]
Chartered Accountants Act, 1949
Bhaurao Dagdu Paralkar vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 22 August, 2005
He
submitted that in case of delay in filing petition challenging order
in question or in case of fraud committed by respondent no. 5, delay
may not come in way of petitioners relied upon decision of Apex
Court reported in case of Bhaurao Dagdu Paralkar Vs. State of
Maharashtra reported in AIR 2005 SC 3330 para 10 and 12, are
quoted as under:
Section 16 in The Trade Marks Act, 1999 [Entire Act]
Indian Bank vs M/S Satyam Fibres (India} Pvt.Ltd on 9 August, 1996
585) and Indian Bank Vs. Satyam Febres (India) Pvt. Ltd (1996 (5)
SCC 550)
Anup Engineering Ltd. vs The Controller Of Patents Office, New ... on 19 February, 1982
*
in case of Anup Engineering Limited Vs. Controller of Patents,
New Delhi reported in 1982 GLHEL-HC 200681 and relied para
16 which is quoted as under:
Mariamma Roy vs Indian Bank & Ors on 16 September, 2008
(i) xxxxxxxxx
*
in case of Maiamma Roy Vs. Indian Bank reported in 2008 (12)
SCALE 451, relevant para 3 is quoted as under: