Committee Of Management & Anr vs Vice Chancellor & Ors on 16 December, 2008
*
in case of Committee of Management Vs. Vice Chancellor
reported in 2009 (2) SCC 630 para 21 and 25 are relevant
therefore, quoted as under:
Search Results Page
Search Results
41 - 47 of 47 (0.15 seconds)Guruvayur Devaswom Managing Commit. & ... vs C.K. Rajan & Others on 14 August, 2003
(See: also Guruvayoor Devaswom Managing Committee & Anr. Vs. C.
K. Rajan & Ors.., 2003 (7) SCC 546)
In this case,
albeit before us for the first time, the vires of the proviso
appended to Sec. 16 of the Act is in question, besides other points
noticed by us hereinbefore.
Bhanu Kumar Jain vs Archana Kumar & Anr on 17 December, 2004
16.
The principles laid down in the case of Chandra Kumar (supra)
virtually embody a rule of law and in view of Article 141 of the
Constitution the same is binding on the High Court. The High Court
fell into an error by allowing the appellants to approach it
in clear violation of the Constitution Bench judgment of this Court
in Chandra Kumar [1(1997) 3 SCC 261:1997 SCC (L&S) 577]
Grindlays Bank Ltd vs Central Government Industrial ... on 12 December, 1980
In Grindlays Bank Ltd. v. Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal [1980
Supp SCC 420:1981 SCC (L&S) 309] this Court has held that an
Industrial Tribunal has the requisite jurisdiction to recall an ex
parte award.
M/S Sangham Tape Company vs Hans Raj on 27 September, 2004
Gujarat Electricity Board vs M.P. Sinha Or Successor Regional P.F. ... on 1 July, 1999
In
case of Gujarat
Electricity Board versus MP Sinha or successor, Regional Provident
Fund Commissioner,
reported in 2000 (1) GLH 65, this Court observed as under in para 15
and 16:
Dinesh R. Shah vs Institute Of Chartered Accounts Of ... on 28 February, 2003
In
case of Dinesh R.
Shah versus Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
reported in 2003 (2) GLH page 590, this aspect has been examined by
this Court. Relevant observations made by this Court in para 7 of
said judgment are quoted as under: