Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.25 seconds)
Pacs vs Union on 6 September, 2010 cites

Rourkela Shramik Sangh vs Steel Authority Of India Ltd. & Anr on 29 January, 2003

11. In the instant case the High Court has itself observed that disputed questions of fact were involved and yet went on to give directions as if it was adjudicating the money claim in a suit. The course is clearly impermissible. (See: General Manager, Kisan Sahkari Chini Mills Ltd., Sultanpur U.P. v. Satrughan Nishad and others (2003 (8) SCC 639), Rourkela Shramik Sangh v. Steel Authority of India Ltd. and Another (2003(4) SCC 317).
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 81 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Apparel Export Promotion Council vs A.K. Chopra on 20 January, 1999

15. The scope of judicial review was considered in latest pronouncement of the apex court in Apparel Export Promotion Council Vs. A.K. Chopra (1999) 1 SCC 759 decided on 20.1.1999 where it was held that the judicial review is not concerned with the correctness of the decision but is confined to the examination of the decision making process, namely, that the established principles of law and rules of natural justice and fairness have been followed or not. The court exercising powers of judicial review cannot substitute its opinion for that of the administrative authority.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 566 - V N Khare - Full Document
1