Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.27 seconds)
Haryana Self Financed Private Colleges ... vs National Council For Teacher Education on 13 March, 2023 cites

Agricultural Market Committee vs Shalimar Chemical Works Ltd on 7 May, 1997

(c) Whether clauses (ii) of para 4 of the said Public Notice dated 22.09.2019 is ultra vires the NCTE Act as it seeks to create new policy heads not contemplated under the NCTE Act and is thus not contrary to law declared by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Agricultural Market Committee Vs Shalimar Chemical Works Ltd [(1997) 5 SCC 516] and Kunj Behari Lal Butail Vs State of H.P [(2000) 3 SCC 40]?
Supreme Court of India Cites 39 - Cited by 103 - S S Ahmad - Full Document

Kunj Behari Lal Butail And Ors vs State Of Himachal Pradesh And Ors on 18 February, 2000

(c) Whether clauses (ii) of para 4 of the said Public Notice dated 22.09.2019 is ultra vires the NCTE Act as it seeks to create new policy heads not contemplated under the NCTE Act and is thus not contrary to law declared by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Agricultural Market Committee Vs Shalimar Chemical Works Ltd [(1997) 5 SCC 516] and Kunj Behari Lal Butail Vs State of H.P [(2000) 3 SCC 40]?
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 132 - R C Lahoti - Full Document

State Of Rajasthan vs Mohinuddin Jamal Alvi & Anr on 4 May, 2016

―11. ....where a power is given to do a certain thing in a certain way, the thing must be done in that way or not at all. Other methods of performance are necessarily forbidden.‖ This principle has been consistently followed by the Supreme Court in a number of judgments [refer: State of Rajasthan v. Mohinuddin Jamal Alvi & ANR., (2016) 12 SCC 608; State v. Sanjeev Nanda, (2012) 8 SCC 450); Nika Ram v. State of H.P., (1972) 2 SCC 80; Delhi Airtech Services (P) Ltd. v. State of U.P., (2011) 9 SCC 354)].
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 6 - A K Sikri - Full Document

State Tr.P.S.Lodhi Colony,New Delhi vs Sanjeev Nanda on 3 August, 2012

―11. ....where a power is given to do a certain thing in a certain way, the thing must be done in that way or not at all. Other methods of performance are necessarily forbidden.‖ This principle has been consistently followed by the Supreme Court in a number of judgments [refer: State of Rajasthan v. Mohinuddin Jamal Alvi & ANR., (2016) 12 SCC 608; State v. Sanjeev Nanda, (2012) 8 SCC 450); Nika Ram v. State of H.P., (1972) 2 SCC 80; Delhi Airtech Services (P) Ltd. v. State of U.P., (2011) 9 SCC 354)].
Supreme Court of India Cites 42 - Cited by 334 - D Verma - Full Document

Nika Ram vs The State Of Himachal Pradesh on 28 April, 1972

―11. ....where a power is given to do a certain thing in a certain way, the thing must be done in that way or not at all. Other methods of performance are necessarily forbidden.‖ This principle has been consistently followed by the Supreme Court in a number of judgments [refer: State of Rajasthan v. Mohinuddin Jamal Alvi & ANR., (2016) 12 SCC 608; State v. Sanjeev Nanda, (2012) 8 SCC 450); Nika Ram v. State of H.P., (1972) 2 SCC 80; Delhi Airtech Services (P) Ltd. v. State of U.P., (2011) 9 SCC 354)].
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 227 - H R Khanna - Full Document

M/S Delhi Airtech Services Pvt. ... vs State Of U.P. & Anr on 18 August, 2011

―11. ....where a power is given to do a certain thing in a certain way, the thing must be done in that way or not at all. Other methods of performance are necessarily forbidden.‖ This principle has been consistently followed by the Supreme Court in a number of judgments [refer: State of Rajasthan v. Mohinuddin Jamal Alvi & ANR., (2016) 12 SCC 608; State v. Sanjeev Nanda, (2012) 8 SCC 450); Nika Ram v. State of H.P., (1972) 2 SCC 80; Delhi Airtech Services (P) Ltd. v. State of U.P., (2011) 9 SCC 354)].
Supreme Court of India Cites 93 - Cited by 731 - S Kumar - Full Document
1