Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.24 seconds)

R. Vijayan vs Baby & Anr on 11 October, 2011

28. Point No.3: As discussed in connection with Point Nos.1 & 2, the complainant has proved its case as to commission of the offence punishable U/s.138 of N.I. Act by the accused. The punishment prescribed for the said offence is imprisonment for a period which may extend to two years or with fine. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, nature, year of the transaction, nature of the instrument involved, provisions of Sec.117 of N.I. Act, cost of litigation and the rate of interest proposed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in 2012 (1) SCC 260 (R.Vijayan Vs Baby), etc., this court is of the considered view that it is just and desirable to impose fine of Rs.90,00,000/- and out of the said amount a sum of Rs.10,000/- has to be remitted to the State and the remaining amount of Rs.89,90,000/- is to be given to the complainant as compensation as provided U/s.357(1) of Cr.PC and accordingly Point No.3 is answered in Affirmative.
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 845 - R V Raveendran - Full Document
1