Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.17 seconds)

K. Arockiyaraj vs The Chief Judicial Magistrate on 27 August, 2013

10. The decision of the aforesaid Full Bench of the Madras High Court has further been relied upon by the same High Court in the matter of T.C. Ramadoss and another v. The Chief Manager and Authorised Officer, State Bank of India, Chennai and others 4 wherein Satish K. Agnihotri, J, as then His Lordship was, speaking for the Division Bench, while following the decision in K. Arockiyaraj (supra) held that the legislators have made it clear that 4 AIR 2015 Madras 67 W.P.(C)No.1705/2017 & W.P.(Art. 227)No.345/2017 Page 9 of 11 in any area other than a metropolitan area, the District Magistrate of the concerned area will have jurisdiction to exercise power under Section 14 of the Act, 2002, but, in metropolitan area, it is only the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, who has the jurisdiction to exercise power under Section 14 of the Act, 2002. The Division Bench further held in para 10 as under: -
1