Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.18 seconds)
Satyapal Singh Verma vs State Of U.P. And Another on 26 September, 2022 cites

Smt. Nagawwa vs Veeranna Shivallngappa Konjalgi on 23 April, 1976

Some of them are akin to the illustrative examples given in the above referred case of Smt. Nagawwa Vs. Veeranna Shivalingappa Konjalgi 1976 3 SCC 736. The cases where the allegations made against the accused or the evidence collected by the Investigating Officer do not constitute any offence or where the allegations are absurd or extremely improbable impossible to believe or where prosecution is legally barred or where criminal proceeding is malicious and malafide instituted with ulterior motive of grudge and vengeance alone may be the fit cases for the High Court in which the criminal proceedings may be quashed.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 1869 - S M Ali - Full Document

Vadilal Panchal vs Dattatraya Dulaji Ghadigaonker And ... on 6 May, 1960

Through a catena of decisions given by Hon'ble Apex Court this legal aspect has been expatiated upon at length and the law that has evolved over a period of several decades is too well settled. The cases of (1) Chandra Deo Singh Vs. Prokash Chandra Bose AIR 1963 SC 1430 , (2) Vadilal Panchal Vs. Dattatraya Dulaji Ghadigaonker AIR 1960 SC 1113 and (3) Smt. Nagawwa Vs. Veeranna Shivalingappa Konjalgi 1976 3 SCC 736 may be usefully referred to in this regard.
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 1023 - S K Das - Full Document

Chandra Deo Singh vs Prokash Chandra Bose & Anr on 22 January, 1963

Through a catena of decisions given by Hon'ble Apex Court this legal aspect has been expatiated upon at length and the law that has evolved over a period of several decades is too well settled. The cases of (1) Chandra Deo Singh Vs. Prokash Chandra Bose AIR 1963 SC 1430 , (2) Vadilal Panchal Vs. Dattatraya Dulaji Ghadigaonker AIR 1960 SC 1113 and (3) Smt. Nagawwa Vs. Veeranna Shivalingappa Konjalgi 1976 3 SCC 736 may be usefully referred to in this regard.
Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 1434 - J R Mudholkar - Full Document

Damodar S.Prabhu vs Sayed Babalal H on 3 May, 2010

As requested by the counsel, it is directed that the accused may appear before the court below within a period of one month from today through the representing counsel and move an application seeking compounding of offence through compromise. On such application being moved the concerned court may take adequate steps in accordance with law in this regard and shall provide further opportunity to the accused which shall not exceed a maximum period of four months from today to make an endeavour in this direction. Thereafter, the court shall pass necessary orders specifically keeping in view the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Damodar S. Prabhu (supra) within a period of five months from today.
Supreme Court of India Cites 24 - Cited by 5512 - Full Document

M/S Meters And Instruments Private ... vs Kanchan Mehta on 5 October, 2017

In the last, the counsel has urged before the Court that the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of offence involved are such in which the litigating parties should be given a chance to settle this matter amicably and for this purpose some protective direction may be given by this Court so that adequate steps may be taken in furtherance of the same object. The counsel has also placed reliance on the judgments of Apex Court given in the case of Damodar S. Prabhu Vs. Sayed Babalal H., reported in 2010(5) SCC 663 and M/s. Meters & Instrument Private Ltd. & Another vs. Kanchan Mehta, reported in (2018) 1 SCC 560. in this regard. Submission is that the Apex Court decision has taken cognizance of the heavy pendency of the cases in the courts which may result ultimately in the chocking of criminal justice system. It has been urged that with the laudable object of providing the rival parties, who have hitherto locked their horns in litigation, an opportunity to arrive at a mutually agreeable settlement and put an end to the escalating litigations, the compounding of the offence has not only been encouraged but in order to given incentive to do so at the earliest stage, certain directions have also been issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.
Supreme Court of India Cites 48 - Cited by 753 - A K Goel - Full Document
1