Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. And ... vs N.R. Vairamani And Anr on 1 October, 2004
12. Arguing for private respondents Sh. Ajesh Luthra stated that respondents were promotees to the post of Income Tax Inspectors in the years 2006, 2007 and 2008 and have got themselves impleaded in this O.A. to bring the full facts of the case to the notice of this Court. Sh. Luthra, learned counsel stated that the factual situation prevailing in this case was quite distinct from that of N.R. Parmars case and that judgment is not applicable in the case of applicants herein. For this purpose the matter requires to be gone into in details to understand the intricacies involved. Learned counsel further stated that it is a settled legal proposition that where facts are different, the judgment does not have a precedential value. One additional fact can change the entire course. A judgment applicable only in the same factual matrix as laid down by the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and Anr. Vs. N.R. Vairamani & Ors., JT 2004(8)SC 171.