Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.25 seconds)
National Insurance Co. Ltd vs R.Vimala on 8 September, 2015 cites

Sarla Verma & Ors vs Delhi Transport Corp.& Anr on 15 April, 2009

In view of the aforesaid reasons, it would be just and reasonable for us to take his notional income at Rs.30,000/- and further taking the young age of the parents, namely the mother who was about 36 years old, at the time of accident, by applying the legal principles laid down in the case of Sarla Verma V. Delhi Transport Corporation, 2009 (2) TN MAC 1 (SC):2009 (6) SCC 121, the multiplier of 15 can be applied to the multiplicand.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 20141 - R V Raveendran - Full Document

M.C.D vs Asscn.,Victims Of Uphaar Tragedy & Ors on 13 October, 2011

The said amount will carry interest at the rate of 95 p.a. by applying the law laid down in the case of Municipal Council of Delhi Vs. Association of Victims of Uphaar Tragedy, 2011 (14) SCC 481, for the reason that the Insurance Company has been contesting the claim of the Appellants from 1992-2013 without settling their legitimate claim for nearly about 21 years, if the Insurance Company had awarded and paid just and reasonable compensation to the Appellants the same could have been either invested or kept in the fixed deposit, then the amount could have earned five times more than what is awarded today in this Appeal. Therefore, awarding 9% interest on the compensation awarded in favour of the Appellants is legally justified.
Supreme Court of India Cites 27 - Cited by 1848 - R V Raveendran - Full Document
1