Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.19 seconds)
Rajeshkumar Trivedi vs Department Of Posts on 17 October, 2025 cites

The Union Of India & Anr vs Sd-211720 Shri Naresh Kumar & 8 Ors on 28 March, 2016

(i) By referring the common judgment/order dated 27.05.2025 passed by the Hon‟ble High Court of Delhi in the case of Union of India Vs Dheeraj Pal & Ors. [WP (C) No. 7301/2025 and WP (C) 7412 /2025 (Union of India Vs Naresh Kumar & Ors.)], the CAT, Principal ::23 :: OA No. 105/2025 & allied matters Bench vide its common order dated 23.07.2025 also allowed the identical group of OAs (i.e., OA Nos. 4477/2024 and other cognate OAs).
Gauhati High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Jc No 642552M Rakshpal Singh (Retired) vs Union Of India on 26 September, 2016

(l) The CAT, Principal Bench in OA No. 2758/2015 (Bhagwan Singh Chahar & Ors. Vs the Principal Secretary, Ministry of Communication & IT & Ors.), by referring the various coordinate Benches of this Tribunal, judgments passed by the Hon‟ble High Courts and Hon‟ble Apex Court as also by taking into consideration the order dated 20.09.2023 passed in identical OA i.e., OA No. 3644/2019, in the case of Rakshpal Singh & Ors. Vs UoI, the CAT, Principal Bench vide order dated 30.1.2025, allowed the OA and directed the respondents to extend the benefits of RTP period to the applicants therein.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Union Of India vs Ex Capt Dheeraj Bhargava on 29 September, 2016

Further, the very objections raised by the Department of Posts about delay in approaching the Court/Tribunal by the similarly placed RTP employees has been considered by the Hon‟ble High Court and the same has not been accepted (ref: Union of India Vs Dheeraj Pal & Ors. in WP (C) No. 7301/2025 decided by the Hon‟ble High Court of Delhi vide common order/judgment dated 27.05.2025). Even otherwise, we are also in agreement with the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant that "continuing wrongs" refers to a single wrongful act which causes a continuing injury and thus the grievance of the applicant is maintainable in the present OAs. Accordingly, we allow the MAs by condoning the delay caused in filing the present OAs.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - T S Thakur - Full Document
1