Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.55 seconds)
Zile Singh And Another vs Avtar Singh And Others on 10 November, 2009 cites

Prem Chand Garg vs Haryana State Industrial Development ... on 22 February, 2006

In Prem Chand's case [supra], the dispute was that before which Court, an application for making the Award rule of the Court, would be maintainable. It was held at one stage that such application would be maintainable before the High Court as the respondents have Civil Revision No. 6499 of 2009 [13] stated before the High Court that the matter stands referred to an Arbitrator, whereas earlier in a Civil Suit challenging the resumption order, proceedings were stayed in view of the arbitration clause in the agreement between the parties. Such disputed question in respect of the Court before whom application would be maintainable was said to be bona-fide and thus, the period was ordered to be excluded under Section 14 of the Act.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 5 - H Gupta - Full Document

Hari Singh vs Gurdial Singh on 7 October, 1999

In Hari Singh v. Gurdial Singh, 2000(2) PLR 250, the plaintiff earlier filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell before the date fixed by the parties for execution of the sale deed. The suit was dismissed as premature by the trial Court, but in appeal, the plaint was rejected. In a subsequent suit, the plaintiff sought to exclude the time spent in prosecuting the previous suit. It was found that the period spent in prosecuting the earlier suit cannot be excluded.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 1 - R L Anand - Full Document
1