Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (3.19 seconds)

State Of Punjab vs Baldev Singh on 21 July, 1999

Compliance of Section 50 of the NDPS Act is mandatory and it is imperative to follow the requirement of the statute strictly, failing which the conviction cannot be sustained. The Accused is required to be informed of his/her right of seeking a search in presence of the Magistrate or the gazetted offcer and the law on this point is well settled by the Constitution Bench decision of the Apex Court in the case of State of Punjab Vs. Baldev Singh1, where it is categorically held that it is imperative for the Investigating Offcer to inform the suspect, orally or in writing, about his right to be searched before a gazetted offcer or a Magistrate and failure to apprise about such a right would not vitiate the trial, but render the recovery of illicit article illegal and vitiate the conviction and sentence, if recorded only on the basis of possession of such illicit article/substance.
Supreme Court of India Cites 55 - Cited by 1329 - Full Document
1