cites: 69868614 benchid: b-p-sinha

1 - 2 of 2 (0.26 seconds)

Ashok Debbarma @ Achak Debbarma vs State Of Tripura on 4 March, 2014 cites

Tahsildar Singh And Another vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 5 May, 1959

This Court in Hate Singh Bhagat Singh (supra) held that the answers given by the accused under Section 313 examination can be used for proving his guilt as much as the evidence given by the prosecution witness.

Supreme Court of India Cites 30 - Cited by 373 - B P Sinha - Full Document

Kanta Prashad vs Delhi Administration(And Connected ... on 6 February, 1958

In Kanta Prashad v. Delhi Administration AIR 1958 SC 350, this Court stated that the failure to hold the Test Identification Parade does not make the evidence of identification at the trial inadmissible. However, the weight to be attached to such identification would be for the Court to decide and it is prudent to hold the Test Identification Parade with respect to witnesses, who did not know the accused before the occurrence.

Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 169 - S J Imam - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results

Tahsildar Singh And Another vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 5 May, 1959

Kanta Prashad vs Delhi Administration(And Connected ... on 6 February, 1958