State Of Rajasthan & Ors vs Anil Kumar Sunil Kumar & Party & Anr on 3 April, 2000
In the present case convict has been convicted for offence
punishable u/s. 3 DPDP Act. No previous conviction has been alleged or
proved against convict. The convict is not involved in any such case, as
State Vs. Anil Kr.; FIR No. 1047-14; PS UN 2/2
stated by him. Convict is having a family to support.
Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and
also the fact that the accused/convict is facing trial for defacing the public
property by putting board for advertisement and he is first time offender.
I am of considered view that ends of justice would be met if the convict is
admonished u/s. 3 of The Probation of Offender's Act, 1958. Further u/s.
5 of The Probation of Offender's Act, 1958, convict is directed to deposit
Rs. 1000/ as the cost of the proceedings of the court. The same has been
deposited. Receipt be issued.