Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.63 seconds)
M/S Bosch Limited vs Labour Through Karnataka Rakshak on 14 January, 2019 cites

Gujarat Electricity Board,Thermal ... vs Hind Mazdoor Sabha & Ors on 9 May, 1995

40. The learned senior counsel for the petitioner placed reliance on a decision in Gujarat Electricity Board Vs., Hind Mazdoor Sabha (1995(II) LLJ 790 and contended that community of interest means the workmen of principal employer who are interested in absorption of contract labour should espouse their case and that if a contractor for any particular period of time did not have a licence that does not confer a permanent employee status to contract labour with the principal employer . On the face of the view taken as above that there existed relationship of employer and employee between the 40 petitioner and respondent workmen for more than one reason, this decision is of no help to the petitioner.
Supreme Court of India Cites 66 - Cited by 172 - P B Sawant - Full Document

Steel Authority Of India Ltd vs Union Of India & Ors on 26 September, 2006

41. Further the learned senior counsel placed reliance on a decision in Steel Authority of India Ltd., vs., Union of India & others, reported in 2006(4) L.L.N.651 and contended that entire salary/wages social benefits like P.F. ESI, bonus etc., as protected were paid by the contractor and therefore the respondent workmen cannot be deemed to be the employees of the principal employer. But the evidence in the case is otherwise and on the basis of the material, it is observed as above that such social benefits are deducted by the petitioner from out of the salary of the respondent workmen and therefore this decision is also of no help to the petitioner.
Supreme Court of India Cites 24 - Cited by 152 - S B Sinha - Full Document
1