Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 30 (0.30 seconds)
Htc India Private Limited & Ors vs Link Telecom Private Limited on 3 January, 2023 cites

Puneet Dalmia vs Central Bureau Of Investigation on 16 December, 2019

"It is within the powers of a Magistrate and in his judicial discretion to dispense with the personal appearance of an accused either throughout or at any particular stage of such proceedings in a summons case, if he/she finds that insistence of personal presence would inflict enormous suffering or tribulations to the accused, and the comparative advantage would be nominal. While the Apex Court laid down aforestated principle in dealing with a summons case, it has thereafter applied the same principles in the warrant case of Puneet Dalmia v. CBI (2020) 12 SCC 695."
Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 39 - M R Shah - Full Document

Central Bureau Of Investigation, ... vs Duncans Agro Industries Ltd.,Calcutta on 9 July, 1996

20. The question directly arose for consideration in Central Bureau of Investigation v. Duncans Agro Industries Ltd., Calcutta [1996 (5) SCC 591]. It related to a complaint against the accused for offences of criminal breach of trust. It was alleged that a floating charge was created by the accused debtor on the goods by way of security under a deed of hypothecation, in favour of a bank to cover credit facility and that the said goods were disposed of by the debtor. It was contended that the disposal of the goods amounted to criminal breach of trust. Negativing the said contention, this Court after stating the principle as to when a complaint can be quashed at the threshold, held thus :
Supreme Court of India Cites 25 - Cited by 542 - G N Ray - Full Document
1   2 3 Next