cites: 78437767 doctypes: judgments

A. K. Roy, Etc vs Union Of India And Anr on 28 December, 1981

In support of the aforesaid grounds, the decisions of 'A.K. Roy vs. Union of India' 1982(1) SCC 271, 'Rekha vs. State of Tamil Nadu' 2011(5) SCC 244 and 'Ameena Begum vs. State of Telangana & others' 2023 (9) SCC 587 have been relied upon.

Supreme Court of India Cites 105 - Cited by 516 - Y V Chandrachud - Full Document

Ameena Begum vs The State Of Telangana on 4 September, 2023

In support of the aforesaid grounds, the decisions of 'A.K. Roy vs. Union of India' 1982(1) SCC 271, 'Rekha vs. State of Tamil Nadu' 2011(5) SCC 244 and 'Ameena Begum vs. State of Telangana & others' 2023 (9) SCC 587 have been relied upon.

Supreme Court of India Cites 70 - Cited by 2 - D Datta - Full Document

K. Anandan Nambiar And Another vs Chief Secretary, Government Of Madras ... on 27 October, 1965

6. Article 105 of Constitution has been subjected to judicial scrutiny on various occasions right from the case of 'K. Anandan Nambiar & another vs. Chief Secretary, Govt. of Madras & others' (1966) 2 SCR 406; 'Keshav Singh vs. Speaker, Legislative Assembly & others' AIR 1965 (SC) 745, 'Smt.

Supreme Court of India Cites 37 - Cited by 29 - P B Gajendragadkar - Full Document

Keshav Singh vs Speaker, Legislative Assembly And Ors. on 10 March, 1965

6. Article 105 of Constitution has been subjected to judicial scrutiny on various occasions right from the case of 'K. Anandan Nambiar & another vs. Chief Secretary, Govt. of Madras & others' (1966) 2 SCR 406; 'Keshav Singh vs. Speaker, Legislative Assembly & others' AIR 1965 (SC) 745, 'Smt.

Allahabad High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 5 - Full Document

Indira Nehru Gandhi vs Shri Raj Narain & Anr on 7 November, 1975

Indira Nehru Gandhi vs. Shri Raj Narain' 1975 (Supp) SCC 1, 'Tej Kiran Jain & others vs. N. Sanjiva Reddy & others' AIR 1971 Delhi 86 to the recent case of 'Shekhar Tiwari vs. State of U.P. & others' 2009 SCC OnLine All 485. It has been categorically held in all these authoritative decisions that no higher or special right is available to a preventively detained sitting Member of Parliament, than an ordinary citizen. Therefore, a sitting Member of Parliament as well as a common man would be subjected to the same privileges and obligations as contained in Section 15 of NSA.

Supreme Court of India Cites 168 - Cited by 520 - Full Document

Tej Kiran Jain And Others vs N. Sanjiva Reddy And Others on 8 May, 1970

Indira Nehru Gandhi vs. Shri Raj Narain' 1975 (Supp) SCC 1, 'Tej Kiran Jain & others vs. N. Sanjiva Reddy & others' AIR 1971 Delhi 86 to the recent case of 'Shekhar Tiwari vs. State of U.P. & others' 2009 SCC OnLine All 485. It has been categorically held in all these authoritative decisions that no higher or special right is available to a preventively detained sitting Member of Parliament, than an ordinary citizen. Therefore, a sitting Member of Parliament as well as a common man would be subjected to the same privileges and obligations as contained in Section 15 of NSA.

Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 28 - M Hidayatullah - Full Document

Alok Shekhar Tiwari vs State Of U.P. & Others on 8 September, 2015

Indira Nehru Gandhi vs. Shri Raj Narain' 1975 (Supp) SCC 1, 'Tej Kiran Jain & others vs. N. Sanjiva Reddy & others' AIR 1971 Delhi 86 to the recent case of 'Shekhar Tiwari vs. State of U.P. & others' 2009 SCC OnLine All 485. It has been categorically held in all these authoritative decisions that no higher or special right is available to a preventively detained sitting Member of Parliament, than an ordinary citizen. Therefore, a sitting Member of Parliament as well as a common man would be subjected to the same privileges and obligations as contained in Section 15 of NSA.

Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - H L Dattu - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results