cites: 80271995 tag: criminal-procedure-code

1 - 3 of 3 (0.29 seconds)

Rama Shankar & Ors. vs State on 29 April, 2014 cites

Shivaji Sahebrao Bobade & Anr vs State Of Maharashtra on 27 August, 1973

established. There is not only a grammatical but a legal distinction between "may be proved" and "must be or should be proved" as was held by this Court in Shivaji Sahabrao Bobade v. State of Maharashtra, (1973) 2 SCC 793, where the observations were made:-

Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 1846 - V R Iyer - Full Document

Nika Ram vs The State Of Himachal Pradesh on 28 April, 1972

In Nika Ram v. State of H.P., [(1972) 2 SCC 80 : 1972 SCC (Cri) 635 : AIR 1972 SC 2077] it was observed that the fact that the accused alone was with his wife in the house when she was murdered there with "khukhri" and the fact that the relations of the accused with her were strained would, in the absence of any cogent explanation by him, point to his guilt.

Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 227 - H R Khanna - Full Document

Saroj Rani vs Govt. Of N.C.T. Of Delhi & Ors. on 3 June, 2010

53. The observations made by this Court in Rani v. State of NCT of Delhi, 2011 (1) JCC 668 also requires mention. Although that was a case pertaining to section 498A/304B IPC, but the observations are equally applicable to the facts of the present case, inasmuch as, the incident had taken place within the four walls of matrimonial home of Crl. A. No. 109/2000 Page 44 of 51 the deceased. It was observed as under:-

Delhi High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 38 - S Muralidhar - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results

Shivaji Sahebrao Bobade & Anr vs State Of Maharashtra on 27 August, 1973

Nika Ram vs The State Of Himachal Pradesh on 28 April, 1972

Saroj Rani vs Govt. Of N.C.T. Of Delhi & Ors. on 3 June, 2010