M/S.R & H Property Developers Private ... vs Pcit-11, Mumbai on 30 July, 2019
Ltd. vs. PCIT
[2018] 168 ITD 499 (Kolkata - Trib.)
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.25 seconds)Dcit 8(2), Mumbai vs Phl Pharma P.Ltd, Mumbai on 12 January, 2017
He submitted that
both the above said judgments have been extensively considered
by the Mumbai Tribunal in DCIT v. PHL Pharma Pvt Ltd [2017]
163 ITD 10 (Mum).The Tribunal, after considering these
judgments concluded that the CBDT Circular No 5 of 2012
would not apply to allied medical companies.
Dcit 2(1)(1), Mumbai vs Aristo Pharmaceuticals P.Ltd, Mumbai on 26 July, 2018
Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. DCIT [2017] 85
taxmann.com 354 (Ahmedabad - Trib.)
Dr. Reddy'S Laboratories Limited, Hyd, ... vs Acit, Circle-17(1), Hyderabad, ... on 28 April, 2017
- para 28
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd. v. ACIT [2017] 81
taxmann.com 398 (Hyderabad - Trib.) - para 42 and 43
Aishika Pharma (P.)
M/S. Asset Investment Services,, Thane vs Acit-26(1),, Mumbai on 28 January, 2020
In its order, the
Tribunal has noted the decision of the co-ordinate bench of
the Tribunal in Geojit Investments (supra).Thus, the allegation
of the Ld. PCIT is vague, ambiguous and devoid of any merit.
The Assessee therefore submits that there is no prejudice to
revenue that has been pointed out by the PCIT in exercising
38
I.T.A. No. 1528/Mum/2018
M/s SRL Diagnostics Pvt. Ltd.
Acit, Ranchi vs M/S M/S Aditya Birla Chemicals India ... on 8 July, 2020
23.6. Further, he submitted, the issue whether the net current
assets or gross current assets must be adopted for calculation of
disallowance u/s 14A was considered by the Ahmedabad
Tribunal in the case of Aditya Medisales Ltd. vs. ACIT
[2016] 67 taxmann.com 270 (Ahd).
Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai vs Acit - 7 (2) (2), Mumbai on 20 December, 2018
In rejoinder, Ld AR submitted that Ld DR in his
submission submitted, CBDT circular binds the AO and payment
made to Doctors is to be disallowed and placed reliance on cases
Liva Healthcare (supra) and Kap Scan (supra).
Bch Electric Ltd( Formerly M/S Bhartia ... vs Department Of Income Tax on 7 September, 2016
assessee. The High Court, setting aside the order of the CIT,
held that power u/s 263 cannot be exercised to force upon an
officer to follow a Circular that expresses a view contrary to
law laid down by Courts.
Infinity Infotech Parks Ltd, Kolkata vs Department Of Income Tax on 18 December, 2013
22.10. He submitted that after making these observations, the
Tribunal held that an order passed by the PCIT without showing
the claim of the assesses to be incorrect is invalid. Similar
observations have been made in the following judgments
ITO v. D.G. Housing Projects Ltd [2012] 343 ITR 329
(Delhi) (para 6)
Infinity Infotech Park Ltd. v. Dy. CIT [2017] SX TTR
(Trib.)
1