cites: 85022909 doctypes: judgments

Allarakha K. Mansuri vs State Of Gujarat on 14 February, 2002

Their Lordships of the Supreme Court in Allarakha K.Mansuri v. State of Gujarat, 2002(1) RCR (Criminal) 748, held that where, in a case, two views are possible, the one which favours the accused, has to be adopted by the Court.

Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 926 - Full Document

State Of Punjab vs Hansa Singh on 30 October, 2000

A Division Bench of this Court in State of Punjab v. Hansa Singh, 2001(1) RCR (Criminal) 775, while dealing with an appeal against acquittal, has opined as under:-

Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 638 - H S Bedi - Full Document

Ashok Kumar vs State Of Rajasthan on 11 September, 1990

"We are of the opinion that the matter would have to be examined in the light of the observations of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Ashok Kumar v. State of Rajasthan, 1991 (1) SCC 166, which are that interference in an appeal against acquittal would be called for only if the judgment under appeal were perverse or based on a mis-reading of the evidence and merely because the appellate Court was inclined to take a different view, could not be a reason calling for interference."

Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 806 - R M Sahai - Full Document

State Of Goa vs Sanjay Thakran And Anr on 2 March, 2007

Similarly, in State of Goa v. Sanjay Thakran (2007) 3 SCC 755 and in Chandrappa v. State of Karnataka, (2007) 4 SCC 415, it was held that where, in a case, two views are possible, the one which favours the accused has to be adopted by the Court.

Supreme Court of India Cites 19 - Cited by 2526 - P P Naolekar - Full Document

Chandrappa & Ors vs State Of Karnataka on 15 February, 2007

Similarly, in State of Goa v. Sanjay Thakran (2007) 3 SCC 755 and in Chandrappa v. State of Karnataka, (2007) 4 SCC 415, it was held that where, in a case, two views are possible, the one which favours the accused has to be adopted by the Court.

Supreme Court of India Cites 40 - Cited by 2545 - Full Document

Mrinal Das & Ors vs State Of Tripura on 5 September, 2011

In Mrinal Das & others v. The State of Tripura, 2011(9) SCC 479, decided on September 5, 2011, the Supreme Court, after looking into many earlier judgments, has laid down parameters, in which interference can be made in a judgment of acquittal, by observing as under:

Supreme Court of India Cites 32 - Cited by 854 - P Sathasivam - Full Document

State Of Rajasthan vs Shera Ram @ Vishnu Dutta on 1 December, 2011

Thereafter, in the above case a large number of judgments were discussed and then it was opined as under:-

Supreme Court of India Cites 27 - Cited by 655 - S Kumar - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results