cites: 851857 doctypes: judgments

1 - 3 of 3 (0.27 seconds)

Commissioner, Kovilpatti ... vs Tamilarasan And 3 Others on 14 August, 1997 cites

Saurashtra Salt Manufacturing Co. vs Bai Valu Raja And Ors. on 28 April, 1958

5. Learned counsel for the appellant brought to my notice the judgment of the Supreme Court reported in Saurashtra Salt Manufacturing Co. v. Bai Valu Raja (1958-II-LLJ-249) the meaning of the words 'in the course of his employment' appearing in Section 3(1) or the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 was examined. The facts in that case are as follows at p 250 :

Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 101 - S J Imam - Full Document

Regional Director, E.S.I Corpn. And Anr vs Francis De Costa And Anr on 5 May, 1992

In our view, this cannot be a ground for departing from the principle laid down by the aforementioned cases that the employment of the workman does not commence until he has reached the place of employment".

Supreme Court of India Cites 44 - Cited by 141 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document

Superintending Engineer, ... vs Andammal on 14 February, 1983

6. A learned single Judge on this Court in S. E. Parambikulam Aliar Project v. Andammal (1983-II-LLJ-326) held as follows at p 328 :

Madras High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 15 - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results

Saurashtra Salt Manufacturing Co. vs Bai Valu Raja And Ors. on 28 April, 1958

Regional Director, E.S.I Corpn. And Anr vs Francis De Costa And Anr on 5 May, 1992

Superintending Engineer, ... vs Andammal on 14 February, 1983