Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (3.09 seconds)
Vijaya vs The State Represented By on 4 November, 2025 cites

The Home Secretary (Prison) vs H. Nilofer Nisha on 23 January, 2020

23. In our considered view, the said request cannot be considered, for the simple reason, when statutorily there is a forum constituted for considering the individual case for premature release by taking into account the various facts and circumstances, as enumerated in the Tamil Nadu Prison Rules, 1983, this Court cannot usurp the power of the said forum and exercise the powers of the Advisory Board. Therefore, this request is rejected.” (emphasis supplied) 18/22 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/11/2025 03:26:29 pm ) W.P. (MD) No.22208 of 2024 ii. Judgment of the Supreme Court in H. Nilofer Nisha, supra:
Supreme Court of India Cites 23 - Cited by 82 - D Gupta - Full Document

Shor vs State Of Uttar Pradesh on 5 August, 2020

26. Be that as it may, considering the fact that the convict prisoner has served out sentence for well over 22 years and 8 months in the prison as on date, the fact that the Advisory Board has recommended for his premature release based on his attitude in the prison and absence of adverse remarks against him and also the dictum laid down by the Supreme Court in Shor, supra, this Court directs the respondents to reappraise the case of the convict prisoner for premature release within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 6 - Full Document
1