Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.32 seconds)Time Incorporated vs Lokesh Srivastava And Anr. on 3 January, 2005
22. With regard to the relief of damages as claimed by the plaintiff in para
37 (iv) of the plaint, the plaintiff has relied upon Time Incorporated v.
Lokesh Srivastava & Anr., 2005 (30) PTC 3 (Del): 2005 (116) DLT
599, wherein while awarding punitive damages of Rs. 5 lakhs in
addition to compensatory damages also of Rs. 5 lakhs, Justice R.C.
Chopra observed as under:
The Heels vs Mr. V.K. Abrol And Anr. on 29 March, 2006
24. This Court in the case of The Heels v. Mr. V.K Abrol and Anr.,
CS(OS) NO.1385 of 2005 decided on 29.03.2006 has held:
Section 51 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
The Companies Act, 1956
Section 52A in The Copyright Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Super Cassettes Industries Ltd. vs Maury Diginet Pvt Ltd on 15 July, 2015
In support of this contention, counsel has relied upon decisions
of this court rendered in the case of Super Cassettes Industries v.
Badshah Internet Service Pvt Ltd & Anr., CS (COMM) 591/2016
dated 06.09.2016, Super Cassettes Industries v. Maury Diginet Pvt
Ltd, CS (OS) 2449/2012 dated 15.07.2015 and Super Cassettes v.
Rachana TV, CS (OS) 1742/2009 dated 13.05.2013.
1