Search Results Page
Search Results
51 - 60 of 65 (0.32 seconds)Sohan Lal Naraindas vs Laxmidas Raghunath Gadit on 8 January, 1971
INTERPRETATION OF DEED PRINCIPLES OF
MOU, for the purpose of these appeals, may be treated to be a family
settlement. It is, however, well-known that intention of the parties to an
instrument must be gathered from the terms thereof examined in the light of
the surrounding circumstances. [See Sohan Lal Naraindas v. Laxmidas
Raghunath Gadit, (1971) 1 SCC 276]
In Delta International Ltd. v. Shyam Sundar Ganeriwalla [(1999) 4
SCC 545], this Court noticed:
Delta International Ltd vs Shyam Sunder Ganeriwalla And Anr on 9 April, 1999
INTERPRETATION OF DEED PRINCIPLES OF
MOU, for the purpose of these appeals, may be treated to be a family
settlement. It is, however, well-known that intention of the parties to an
instrument must be gathered from the terms thereof examined in the light of
the surrounding circumstances. [See Sohan Lal Naraindas v. Laxmidas
Raghunath Gadit, (1971) 1 SCC 276]
In Delta International Ltd. v. Shyam Sundar Ganeriwalla [(1999) 4
SCC 545], this Court noticed:
S. Shanmugam Pillai And Ors vs K. Shanmugam Pillai And Ors on 4 May, 1972
It is now a well-settled principle of law that a document must be
construed having regard to the terms and conditions as well as the nature
thereof. [Union of India v. M/s. Millenium Mumbai Broadcast Pvt. Ltd.
2006 (5) SCALE 44]
MOU
We may proceed on the basis that the MOU answers the principles of
family settlement having regard to the fact that the same was actuated by a
desire to resolve the disputes and the courts would not easily disturb them
as has been held in S. Shanmugam Pillai and Others v. K. Shanmugam
Pillai and Others [(1973) 2 SCC 312], Kale and Others v. Deputy Director
of Consolidation and Others [(1976) 3 SCC 119] and Hari Shankar
Singhania & Ors. v. Gaur Hari Singhania & Ors. [JT 2006 (4) SC 251].
Kale & Others vs Deputy Director Of Consolidation Ors on 21 January, 1976
It is now a well-settled principle of law that a document must be
construed having regard to the terms and conditions as well as the nature
thereof. [Union of India v. M/s. Millenium Mumbai Broadcast Pvt. Ltd.
2006 (5) SCALE 44]
MOU
We may proceed on the basis that the MOU answers the principles of
family settlement having regard to the fact that the same was actuated by a
desire to resolve the disputes and the courts would not easily disturb them
as has been held in S. Shanmugam Pillai and Others v. K. Shanmugam
Pillai and Others [(1973) 2 SCC 312], Kale and Others v. Deputy Director
of Consolidation and Others [(1976) 3 SCC 119] and Hari Shankar
Singhania & Ors. v. Gaur Hari Singhania & Ors. [JT 2006 (4) SC 251].
Hari Shankar Singhania & Ors vs Gaur Hari Singhania & Ors on 4 April, 2006
It is now a well-settled principle of law that a document must be
construed having regard to the terms and conditions as well as the nature
thereof. [Union of India v. M/s. Millenium Mumbai Broadcast Pvt. Ltd.
2006 (5) SCALE 44]
MOU
We may proceed on the basis that the MOU answers the principles of
family settlement having regard to the fact that the same was actuated by a
desire to resolve the disputes and the courts would not easily disturb them
as has been held in S. Shanmugam Pillai and Others v. K. Shanmugam
Pillai and Others [(1973) 2 SCC 312], Kale and Others v. Deputy Director
of Consolidation and Others [(1976) 3 SCC 119] and Hari Shankar
Singhania & Ors. v. Gaur Hari Singhania & Ors. [JT 2006 (4) SC 251].
M/S Gujarat Pottling Co.Ltd. & Ors vs The Coca Cola Co. & Ors on 4 August, 1995
In Gujarat Bottling Co. Ltd. and Others v. Coca Cola Co. and Others
[(1995) 5 SCC 545], it was held that licensing of trade mark is governed by
common law which is also statutorily permissible provided:
Sumat Prasad Jain vs Sheojanam Prasad (Dead) & Ors on 29 August, 1972
In Sumat Prasad Jain v. Sheojanam Prasad (Dead) and Others and
State of Bihar [(1973) 1 SCC 56], this Court held:
City Of Nagpur Corporation vs M/S Khemchand Khushaldas & Sons & Ors on 12 August, 1996
"Again in Grotrian, Helfferich, Schulz, Th.
Steinweg Nachf, a Corporation Vs. Steinway &
Sons, a corporation, 365 F.Supp. 707 (1973),
striking a similar note the Court held as under:
Milmet Oftho Industries & Ors vs Allergan Inc on 7 May, 2004
In Milmet Oftho Industries and Others v. Allergan Inc. [(2004) 12
SCC 624], in regard to medicinal products, this Court opined: