Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.17 seconds)

Gaurav Sondhi vs Diya Sondhi on 3 May, 2005

Having regard to the overall conspectus of circumstances, and in the light of the above discussion, this Court is of the opinion that the Trial Court's determination that the applicant/wife should be granted interim maintenance @ `15000/- per month and minor daughter (Sagarika Kapur) is entitled to `10,000/- per month from the date of filing of the applications till the disposal of the case on merits or till they are legally entitled to receive the same does not call for interference. The husband is directed to clear all arrears of maintenance within four weeks from today in equal installments and to furnish the monthly MAT. APPL(F.C.)24/2013 Page 11 maintenance after the date of orders by way of money order or by deposit in the bank account of the wife on her furnishing the account number of the same, by or before 10th date of each English calendar month. The default shall be viewed in terms of the Trial Court's order, i.e. the consequences spelt out by judgment of this Court in Gaurav Sondhi v. Diya Sondhi 120 (2005) DLT 426. Furthermore, in accordance with settled law, the respondents would be entitled to the maintenance of the highest amount among the various allowances awarded, if any to them by various courts. The present appeal and pending application are dismissed, in the above terms.
Delhi High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 278 - M Mudgal - Full Document
1