Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.67 seconds)

Regional Manager, U.P.S.R.T.C, Etawah ... vs Hoti Lal & Anr on 11 February, 2003

24        In Regional Manager  U.P.  SRTC  V.   Hoti Lal, (2003) 3 SCC  605,   the   Supreme   Court   outlined   the   mode     to   be   adopted   for  determining   whether   the   punishment   imposed   by   the   disciplinary  authority    is   shockingly disproportionate and observed as under:
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 270 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Director General R.P.F. And Ors vs Ch. Sai Babu on 29 January, 2003

If the charged employee   holds   a   position   of trust where honesty and   integrity   are inbuilt requirements of functioning, it would   not be proper   to deal with the matter  leniently.   Misconduct  in  such  cases  has to be   dealt with  iron hands.  Where the person deals  with  public      money  or   is engaged in financial transactions  or   acts in a fiduciary capacity, the   highest   degree   of   integrity   and   trustworthiness   is   a   must   and   unexceptional." (underlining is ours)        25         In Director General, RPF V.  Ch.  Sai Babu (2003) 4 SCC 331,  the Supreme Court   reiterated   that   the   High Court should ordinarily  not interfere with the discretion exercised  by the disciplinary authority  in the matter of imposition of punishment and observed:
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 156 - A Pasayat - Full Document
1