Keshardeo Chamria vs Radha Kissen Chamria And Othersradha ... on 30 October, 1952
18. Mr. Parekh, learned Counsel for Deenanath non-petitioner, vehemently contended that the Revenue Courts have committed no error of jurisdiction nor have committed any illegality or material irregularity in the exercise of jurisdiction. On hearing the revision petitions, the Board of Revenue was right in dismissing the revision petitions and it did not commit any illegality or material irregularity, as this Court should not interfere in the orders of Board of Revenue in its certiorari jurisdiction. As regard the exercise of the revisional powers, Mr Parekh has placed reliance on the decisions of the Supreme Court in Keshardeo Chamria v. Radha Kishan Chamria and Ors. , Pandarang Dhandi Chough and Ors. v. Maruti Hari Jadhav and Ors. and on a Full Bench decision in Harak Chand v. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (1970 R.L.W. 320). This contention of the learned Counsel, in our opinion, has no merit, in view of the fact that the Board failed to consider the material and relevant documents and not only that, whatever documents have been considered, the same have not been considered in their correct perspective and thus, the Board committed an illegality or material irregularity in the exercise of jurisdiction.