Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.23 seconds)
Yogendra @ Jogendra Singh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 12 December, 2014 cites

Bachan Singh Etc. Etc vs State Of Punjab Etc. Etc on 16 August, 1982

In Panchhi v. State of U.P., it has been observed that the brutality of the manner in which the murder was perpetrated may not be the sole ground for judging whether the case is one of the 'rarest of rate cases', as indicated in Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab and that every murder being per se brutal, the distinguishing factors should really be the mitigating or aggravating features surrounding the murder. The intensity of bitterness, which prevailed, and the escalation of simmering thoughts into a thirst for revenge or retaliation were held to be also a relevant factor."
Supreme Court of India Cites 112 - Cited by 863 - P N Bhagwati - Full Document

State Of U.P vs Sattan @ Satyendra & Ors on 27 February, 2009

In State of U.P. v. Sattan (2009) 4 SCC 736 six members of a family were murdered by the accused leaving only three survivors over some personal enmity. The trial court awarded them death sentence. The High Court commuted the sentence to one of life imprisonment. The Supreme Court in appeal noting the brutality of murder held that the accused deserved only a death penalty."
Supreme Court of India Cites 24 - Cited by 74 - A Pasayat - Full Document

State Of Rajasthan vs Kheraj Ram on 22 August, 2003

In State of Rajasthan v. Kheraj Ram, the accused deliberately planned and executed his two innocent children, wife and brother-in-law when they were sleeping at night. There was no remorse for such a gruesome act which was indicated by the calmness with which he was smoking "chilam" after the commission of the act. As it was preplanned and after the entire chain of events and circumstances were comprehended, the inevitable conclusion, was that the accused acted in the most cruel and inhuman manner and the murder was committed in an extremely brutal, grotesque, diabolical, revolting and dastardly manner.
Supreme Court of India Cites 24 - Cited by 57 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Gurdev Singh & Anr vs State Of Punjab on 1 August, 2003

In Gurdev Singh v. State of Punjab, the appellants, having known that on the next day a marriage was to take place in the house of the complainant and there would be lots of relatives present in her house, came there on the evening when a feast was going on and started firing on the innocent persons. Thirteen persons were killed on the spot and eight others were seriously injured. The appellants thereafter went to another place and killed the father and brother of PW 15. Out of the thirteen persons, one of them was a seven-year-old child, three others had ages ranging between 15 and 17 years. The death sentence was held justified.
Supreme Court of India Cites 24 - Cited by 95 - K G Balakrishnan - Full Document
1